The Innovative Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Technological Innovations follows a rigorous, transparent, and impartial editorial and peer review process to maintain the quality, integrity, and academic standards of the journal. Our peer review process ensures that each manuscript is evaluated for its originality, scientific rigor, and relevance to the journal’s scope.

Submission and Initial Screening

Upon submission, manuscripts are first screened by the editorial team for basic compliance with the journal’s scope, formatting guidelines, and ethical standards. Submissions that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without further review. Only manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent for peer review.

Peer Review Process

We follow a double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both the identities of the authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process.

1. Reviewer Selection: Manuscripts are assigned to two or more independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, experience, and impartiality.
2. Review Criteria: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on several criteria, including:
• Originality and novelty of the research
• Scientific rigor and methodology
• Clarity of presentation and structure
• Relevance to the journal’s scope and interdisciplinary focus
• Proper citation and adherence to ethical standards
3. Review Outcome: After the review process, reviewers provide their feedback, which can include:
• Acceptance without revisions
• Minor or major revisions
• Rejection

Decision-Making

The final decision regarding manuscript acceptance or rejection is made by the Editor-in-Chief or handling editor, who considers the feedback from the peer reviewers. Authors will be notified of the decision, along with reviewer comments and any revisions requested. In case of minor or major revisions, authors are expected to resubmit the revised manuscript within a specified timeframe.

Revision and Resubmission

Authors are given the opportunity to revise their manuscript according to the reviewers’ suggestions. Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated by the same reviewers (if necessary) to ensure that all concerns have been addressed adequately.